<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Esquire, Shades Of Cosby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whosemedia.com/drums/2006/11/28/shades-of-cosby-in-esquire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whosemedia.com/drums/2006/11/28/shades-of-cosby-in-esquire/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd Steven Burroughs</title>
		<link>http://whosemedia.com/drums/2006/11/28/shades-of-cosby-in-esquire/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Steven Burroughs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whosemedia.com/drums/2006/11/28/shades-of-cosby-in-esquire/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments.

I went to the Johnson blurb. I remain confused, however, because it seems as if the (selective) "self-criticism" some have decided we need to have publicly seems to be within a reactionary framework. Michael Eric Dyson, Kevin Powell, et. al. don't have to go there. Perhaps it's because they're trying to organize and educate us, not rant. Where's the self-criticism of, for example, a) us not being self-defining and self-determining enough?, and b) "growing up" by creating our own institutions to implement our own agendas? Not in Esquire! Instead, it's "niggers ain't shit," blah, blah, blah, etc. Easy hit, and not bad for your career, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments.</p>
<p>I went to the Johnson blurb. I remain confused, however, because it seems as if the (selective) &#8220;self-criticism&#8221; some have decided we need to have publicly seems to be within a reactionary framework. Michael Eric Dyson, Kevin Powell, et. al. don&#8217;t have to go there. Perhaps it&#8217;s because they&#8217;re trying to organize and educate us, not rant. Where&#8217;s the self-criticism of, for example, a) us not being self-defining and self-determining enough?, and b) &#8220;growing up&#8221; by creating our own institutions to implement our own agendas? Not in Esquire! Instead, it&#8217;s &#8220;niggers ain&#8217;t shit,&#8221; blah, blah, blah, etc. Easy hit, and not bad for your career, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs. J</title>
		<link>http://whosemedia.com/drums/2006/11/28/shades-of-cosby-in-esquire/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs. J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whosemedia.com/drums/2006/11/28/shades-of-cosby-in-esquire/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>I'm no fan of Colin or Condi, but do beleive we are going to have to be self-critical in order to get ahead. Author Mat Johnson has an interesting takeon this at his blog:
http://www.niggerati.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no fan of Colin or Condi, but do beleive we are going to have to be self-critical in order to get ahead. Author Mat Johnson has an interesting takeon this at his blog:<br />
<a href="http://www.niggerati.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.niggerati.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
